Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HB116 Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House debates House Bill 116 over redevelopment agencies and eminent domain; amendment delays effective date but final roll-call unclear in transcript
Summary
Lawmakers debated HB116, which would limit redevelopment agency powers, including use of eminent domain for economic development. Sponsor moved to delay the bill's effective date to 01/01/1995; the amendment passed. Members split over property-rights protections versus blight remediation and tax increment financing; transcript does not unambiguously record the final roll-call tally for the bill.
House members debated House Bill 116, a measure altering redevelopment agency (RDA) authority and limits on eminent domain. Representative Hunter, the bill’s sponsor, moved a narrowly focused amendment that changed the bill’s effective date from May 1, 1994, to Jan. 1, 1995, saying the delay would allow ongoing programs to proceed and address local concerns; the House adopted the amendment.
Hunter repeatedly framed the bill as protecting private property rights, saying the legislation would prevent RDAs from using eminent domain for economic development. “This bill does not eliminate redevelopment agencies,” Hunter told the House, adding the amendment would not apply to existing programs initiated before Jan. 1, 1995.
Opponents said HB116 would hamper cities’ ability to cure blight and use tax increment financing that relies on an RDA’s tools. Representative Jones warned that without the power to assemble parcels the tax-increment approach could collapse: a single holdout, she said, could raise project costs dramatically and prolong blight. Representative Davis described an Irving School site in Sugar House where an RDA was actively working on remediation.
Floor managers limited general debate and used time controls. Members pressed procedural motions, and the House opened voting on HB116; the transcript records a later procedural vote to lift the call of the House (reported 36–24) but does not provide a clear, unambiguous roll-call result for the final passage of HB116 in the machine-readable portion of the transcript.
Because the transcript does not clearly record the final roll-call outcome for HB116 in a way that can be precisely attributed here, this report summarizes the debate, the amendment activity and procedural steps and flags the final recorded tally as not specified in the transcript evidence provided.
