Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Smoking Restrictions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Passes Broad Indoor Smoking Restrictions After Lengthy Floor Fight, 59-11
Summary
After hours of debate and multiple amendment votes over business exemptions and signage rules, the House passed House Bill 50 to restrict indoor public smoking. The final, amended bill passed 59-11 and was referred to the Senate; members disagreed sharply over exemptions for truck stops and restaurants and over employee protections.
Representative Tanner moved to uncircle House Bill 50, describing it as the product of a task force and scientific public-health findings (he cited the American Medical Association and public-health journals) and urging passage to protect children and workers. Tanner and supporters cited testimony from families with asthma and said environmental tobacco smoke disproportionately harms employees and vulnerable patrons.
Representative Brown offered a substitute motion seeking to delete committee amendments that created exemptions (including truck stops), arguing such exceptions create unfair competitive advantages for some businesses and dilute the public-health purpose. The House divided one set of committee amendments into two votes (items 1–3 on truck-stop-related language and 4–6 on implementation timing); the first part and the second part were both adopted in subsequent votes. The committee had earlier delayed implementation from January 1, 1995 to July 1, 1995; that change was explained on the floor.
Representative Suazo later proposed an amendment requiring food-service establishments to post an "Smoking allowed" or "Smoking prohibited" sign in large letters at public entrances; he framed the change as restoring proprietor choice. Opponents, including the sponsor, said that a simple posted opt-in would undercut employee protections and negate months of task-force compromise. Representative Atkinson offered a substitute motion that would allow proprietors to post and permit smoking in restaurants; that substitute failed. The Suazo amendment also failed on final tally after division.
Floor debate repeatedly split along two lines: public-health advocates arguing employees and patrons need uniform protections, and free-market proponents emphasizing owner choice and potential economic harm to small businesses such as truck stops. Representative Tanner repeatedly said he had no evidence statewide smoking restrictions would reduce tourism and that the measure could attract family-oriented business. Representative Brown cited a poll he said showed 70% public support for the bill as written.
After procedural votes and consideration of multiple amendments (including a Barth amendment to make statewide application uniform), the House voted to pass HB 50 as amended by a recorded count of 59 affirmative and 11 negative votes. The bill was referred to the Senate. The House adjourned until 10 a.m. the following morning.
