Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lobbying Disclosure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House amends and circles lobbyist disclosure bill after hours of debate
Summary
After extended floor debate and several divided amendments, the House amended substitute House Bill 26 (lobbyist disclosure and gift limits), then circled the bill for further consideration. Lawmakers split over whether disclosure requirements or personal ethics best protect public trust.
The Utah House spent much of Feb. 3, 1994, debating substitute House Bill 26, a measure that would tighten lobbying disclosures and set limits on gifts lawmakers may accept. Sponsor Representative Jordan Tanner described the bill as a transparency reform, saying it "takes the disclosure amount down" and adds a $50 cap in the statuteon gifts as written on the bill's page 8.
Supporters argued the measure responds to public concerns about access and influence. "Full disclosure is one way to" restore public confidence, Representative Atkinson said during debate, urging defeat of a motion that would delete the bill's disclosure provisions. Representative Garn likewise said disclosure is a "basic principle in democracy" and urged the House to keep the bill's reforms.
Opponents countered that ethics cannot be legislated and urged personal responsibility instead of statutory mandates. Representative Brown moved an amendment that would strike broad sections of the bill, arguing the change was intended to rely on the legislature's internal ethics process; he said that passing the Brown Amendment would "totally gut the bill." Representative Brown also stated his preference that legislators voluntarily disclose rather than delegate reporting to lobbyists.
The House divided votes on a set of Valentine amendments to HB 26 (pink-sheet, Feb. 3). The body adopted parts 1 and 3 of the Valentine package (clarifying the definition of "gift" to reference "tangible personal property" and clarifying reporting details) but rejected part 2, which members said would have created ambiguity about meals and related exceptions. Following extended debate, the body voted on the Brown Amendment; the presiding officer recorded that the motion had passed and that the bill was amended. Representative Tanner then moved to "circle" (hold) substitute HB 26 for further consideration; the House adopted that motion, and the Clerk recorded that substitute HB 26 is amended and circled.
What remains exact in the record is the set of statutory text changes adopted onto the bill and the decision to pause further action: the House incorporated selected Valentine amendments and at least one sponsor-opposed Brown amendment into the bill as amended on the floor, then circled HB 26 for later action. The session record does not provide a complete roll-call tally for each amendment in the transcript segments provided. Further committee or calendar action is required before final passage.
