Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Fair topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves semi-privatization plan for Utah State Fair, with safeguards

Utah House of Representatives · February 28, 1995
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed House Bill 343 to convert Utah State Fair operations to a quasi-public corporation that would lease Fair Park for $10 while retaining state ownership; amendments were added to require geographic board representation, fiscal procedures and commitments to keep the fair at its present site.

The Utah House on Feb. 28 approved House Bill 343 to reorganize the State Fair as a quasi-public corporation that would manage operations while the state retains ownership of Fair Park.

Sponsor Representative Karen B. Smith explained HB343 as the task force recommendation after eight months of study. Under the plan, the fair would be leased for $10 to a nonprofit entity that could accept private donations and corporate sponsorships unrestricted by current state constraints. Sponsor said the move aimed to make the fair more self-sufficient and to open new revenue streams for capital projects such as a coliseum.

Floor amendments were adopted to address concerns raised by members and local residents. Amendments require board membership to reflect geographic diversity (two members from Salt Lake County were added in committee amendments), require fiscal procedures consistent with budgetary controls, and include reporting and oversight provisions intended to preserve the fair’s historic location and community investments.

Supporters argued privatization would reduce an annual state subsidy (the fiscal note cited approximately $630,000 per year) and expand fundraising options; they pointed to comparable experience in other states. Opponents and questioners sought assurances about employee benefits and neighborhood safeguards; sponsors showed letters from the retirement division indicating existing employees would remain in the retirement system and would retain health-care coverage.

After debate and adopted amendments to preserve accountability and local input, the House voted to pass HB343 and sent the bill to the Senate for consideration.