Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House limits public-works wage conditions, rejects amendment to preserve local anti-poverty contracts

Utah House of Representatives · March 1, 1995
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 137 to prohibit state public entities from requiring predetermined wages or project-labor terms in public works contracts; an amendment to preserve small local programs aimed at hiring the homeless failed 29–40 and the bill passed 52–20.

The Utah House on March 1 passed Senate Bill 137, a measure that clarifies state policy on public works contracts by prohibiting state-funded projects from requiring predetermined wages, benefits, or project labor agreements except where federal law applies.

Sponsor Representative Short said the bill is a response to a court decision and intended to standardize procurement policy across state projects. Representative Atkinson and others argued the bill would remove local flexibility that some counties and municipalities use to structure small programs (for example, targeted wages intended to help homeless workers earn a living). Atkinson offered an amendment to preserve a narrow exception for local anti-poverty contract programs; the amendment was rejected in a recorded vote (29 yes, 40 no). After debate the full bill passed the House 52–20.

Supporters emphasized uniform procurement rules and cited the 1981 statute and judicial guidance; opponents warned the bill eliminated options for targeted social programs and described the change as micromanagement from the state. The sponsor said federal-funded projects would be unaffected by the state restriction.

Next steps: SB 137 is returned to the Senate (or forwarded for enactment procedures). Lawmakers on both sides flagged the need to monitor for unintended impact on small community programs.