Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts revised Appropriations Act after floor amendments, returns bill to Senate
Summary
After debate and several floor amendments, the Utah House adopted conference changes to H.B. 3 60, the supplemental Appropriations Act, and sent the bill back to the Senate for signature. Members debated transfers between state and local road funds, the split between bonuses and cost-of-living increases, and technical corrections.
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on March 1 adopted conference revisions to the supplemental Appropriations Act (H.B. 3 60) after extended floor debate over several amendments and procedural motions. Lawmakers opened with a motion to concur in Senate amendments, then suspended the rules to reconsider prior actions so members could offer additional changes.
The House discussion focused on three senate changes described by the sponsor: a 1:1 matching requirement for certain trail funds; an exemption allowing higher-education vehicles to be added when used for rural outreach; and the removal of an earlier Atkinson amendment that had shifted a portion of funds into a cost-of-living allowance (COLA) instead of bonuses. Representative Stephanie Atkinson urged sending the differences to a conference committee, saying the House’s earlier provisions were better for public employees. Other members, including Representative Branson, said they had changed positions after consulting personnel staff and supported concurrence.
Representative Renee Billy successfully moved a later amendment to reinsert previously adopted House and Senate amendments and then placed a significant floor amendment that would transfer $3,000,000 from the state transportation fund into the B&C roads fund, a move framed by supporters as targeting city and county road needs. Debate over that amendment highlighted competing priorities: proponents said the transfer addressed neglected local road maintenance, while opponents objected that a roughly 0.33% change (described on the floor as equivalent to about $1.4 million in one explanation) would produce only modest monthly increases for employees and might be better spent on targeted bonuses.
The House ordered roll-call votes where requested. A proposal tied to switching from bonuses to a COLA failed on a roll call (the amendment reported as receiving 32 yes and 38 no). Later, after the House adopted a conference committee report reconciling outstanding differences, the chamber passed final action on H.B. 3 60 by recorded tally and returned the bill to the Senate for further action; the journal records the House vote after conference as 59 yes to 8 no on adoption of the conference report and later recorded tallies for transmission.
The Appropriations Act package includes multiple line-item corrections and allocations negotiated between the chambers. Sponsors and floor leaders emphasized that the conference process fixed technical and policy details, and that the adopted package balanced budgetary priorities for the remainder of the fiscal year. The speaker then appointed joint conference committee members previously in response to Senate refusal to concur on certain amendments.
The immediate procedural step after the vote is transmission of the adopted conference report and the bill back to the Senate for final action and the President’s signature. No new taxes or permanent program expansions were recorded as part of H.B. 3 60 in the floor transcript; the changes discussed focused on distributions among existing state transportation, local B&C road funds, and employee compensation mechanisms.
