Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workers Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances workers' compensation package after contested floor exchanges over disability and hospital billing
Summary
Lawmakers approved a set of workers' compensation bills including SB123 (permanent total disability), SB124 (uninsured employer penalties), SB125 (settlement authority) and SB127 (provider fee schedules). The package drew sustained debate over employee protections and hospital physician billing; recorded final tallies were mixed but several bills passed.
The Utah House considered a cluster of workers' compensation reforms Feb. 28, approving measures to clarify permanent total disability standards, penalize uninsured employers, authorize settlement approvals by the Industrial Commission and to extend the Commission’s authority over provider fees billed through hospitals.
SB123 (permanent total disability) was described by sponsor David H. Steele as a response to court decisions and a legislative effort to require that an industrial accident or occupational disease be a major factor in a permanent total disability determination. Opponents warned the bill "rests too much on the employer and the insurance carrier and not enough on the permanently disabled employee," and urged caution. After debate the House passed SB123 (57 yes, 14 no).
SB124 (uninsured employer penalty) drew discussion over corporate‑piercing language that a member argued would invite lawsuits; sponsors accepted a friendly amendment deleting that clause and said the bill was designed to protect workers and contractors when employers do not secure coverage. The House passed SB124 (65 yes, 0 no).
SB125 gives the Industrial Commission clearer authority to approve full‑and‑final settlements of workers' compensation claims and passed with unanimous support (68 yes, 0 no).
SB127 proved the most contentious. The bill sought to extend Industrial Commission fee‑schedule authority to physician/provider services rendered through hospitals, addressing stakeholder claims that identical services billed in hospitals can cost four to five times more than in doctors’ offices. Critics warned the bill would amount to government price‑fixing, with Representative Hickman saying "I really have a problem when the government starts to fix prices." Sponsors said a fee schedule already exists for certain providers and extending it to hospital‑billed provider services was necessary to curb escalating claim costs. The bill was amended on the floor and, after an initial vote and subsequent reconsideration to adopt further amendments, was passed (final recorded tally: 55 yes, 13 no).
