Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes wildlife-license overhaul, creates habitat account and new fee structure

Utah House of Representatives · February 23, 1995
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 336 restructures fishing and hunting licenses, replaces multiple stamps with a $5 habitat authorization and adjusts big-game permit fees (some increases for trophy hunts). Sponsors say revenue will fund habitat conservation and access; critics warned about possible pressures to acquire private land and impacts on middle‑class participation.

The Utah House passed House Bill 336 after extended debate, approving a package to restructure wildlife licensing and create a consolidated wildlife habitat account.

Floor sponsor (unnamed in the record) explained the measure replaces the $10 application fee for big-game permits with a $3 fee for the current year, introduces a $5 habitat authorization to be the basis for a single-document license, and consolidates previously separate stamps and accounts (duck stamp, upland game stamp, big-game stamp) into one habitat account overseen by a Habitat Council. The sponsor said the bill would permit general‑season permits to be sold over the counter and would adjust trophy‑hunt fees (for example, an elk trophy permit would increase to $130 this year).

Supporters argued the measure addresses an urgent revenue shortfall in the Division of Wildlife Resources and funds habitat projects and access, including easements and partnerships with private conservation groups. “Money generated from this habitat license will be spent on fish and wildlife habitat,” the sponsor said on the floor.

Opponents and questioners pressed the sponsor on details: what "habitat" purchases entail (the sponsor said the money can be used for easements and marsh/wetland development and that payment‑in‑lieu of taxes would continue for acquired lands), whether higher trophy fees will reduce permit purchases, and whether the change effectively codifies previous division policy. The sponsor acknowledged difficult fiscal history — including a reported $2.6 million deficit in the division last year — and said the bill widens the funding base by charging a modest fee to all license purchasers rather than relying solely on limited‑entry application fees.

The House approved the measure on the floor (reported vote recorded as 64–5) and sent it to the Senate.

Next step: Senate consideration.