Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Performance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves judicial performance review bill over objections about judicial independence
Summary
The Utah House passed the first substitute to H.B. 264 after debate over whether a proposed judicial performance commission would undermine judicial independence. Supporters said judges they consulted did not view the bill as intrusive; the measure passed the House 42–31 and goes to the Senate.
The Utah House of Representatives voted to approve the first substitute to House Bill 264 on Feb. 23, 1995, sending the proposal to the Senate after a contested floor debate.
Proponents argued the measure creates a commission to allow public review of judicial performance. "It would not do those things," one supporter said about concerns that the proposal would curtail judicial independence, adding that three judges the sponsor consulted believed the commission would not interfere with the judiciary. Supporters framed the bill as increasing transparency: "Let the people know what's happening," another member said during debate.
Opponents questioned whether the bill would upset the separation of powers or remove protections for judges, asking whether it would "take away their rights to serve" or affect their ability to be neutral. Supporters rebutted that the commission would focus on "quality and character" and that public participation is an important check in American government.
After debate, the House opened voting. The clerk announced the result: 42 yes, 31 no. The bill will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
The next procedural step is Senate consideration; sponsors and opponents said they expect additional review in the other chamber.
