Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Law topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes amended bill tightening enticement and child-lewdness provisions

Utah House of Representatives · February 17, 1995
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House on Feb. 17 passed First Substitute House Bill 223 to narrow and strengthen statutes on enticing children and lewd acts in a child's presence, adopting targeted amendments to limit unintended coverage of parental behavior; vote: 64-0 to send the substitute to the Senate.

The Utah House passed First Substitute House Bill 223 on Feb. 17, moving provisions on enticing a child and related lewd conduct into sections describing offenses against a person and inserting limiting language intended to avoid criminalizing parental acts. The chamber recorded 64 yes votes and 0 no votes, and the bill was returned to the Senate for further action.

Sponsor Marta Gilroy, who introduced the substitute and drove floor amendments, told colleagues the measure was “an important piece of legislation” aimed at strengthening prosecutors’ tools while narrowing the statute where needed. Early in debate members asked for precise drafting changes; the House agreed to insert the phrase “without lawful authority” and to clarify the bill’s referral to offenses defined in chapter 5 of title 76 (offenses against the person) to avoid overly broad application.

Opponents and questioners pressed the sponsor on how the bill’s mens rea—language reading “intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly”—would apply in difficult factual scenarios. Representative Howard asked whether the statute’s recklessness standard might catch parents who unintentionally exposed children to private marital activity, a hypothetical the sponsor and other members used to justify narrowing edits. Debate centered on whether the standard of recklessness would require awareness of the risk (as proponents argued) or would be read more broadly; members cited the statutory definition of reckless conduct discussed on the floor.

The House moved, debated and adopted the amendment to make the offense read against the person and added clarifying language to limit coverage to conduct committed “without lawful authority.” After further amendments to refine the statutory reference, the House voted to pass the first substitute and transmit the bill to the Senate.

The bill’s next step is consideration by the Senate; House members who voted to 'circle' earlier in the morning indicated they had sought time to resolve drafting concerns before final passage, and the first substitute reflects the changes adopted on the floor.