Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County-recording fee bill fails after debate over 'may' vs. 'shall' and consumer costs

Utah House of Representatives · February 1, 1996
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Susan Cohen's bill to let county recorders charge fees for multiple items filed on one document (HB81) prompted extended debate about consumer costs and whether counties should be required ("shall") or permitted ("may") to charge. The House rejected the measure on a final vote, 31-40.

Representative Susan Cohen, sponsor of House Bill 81, opened floor debate by saying the proposal addresses a narrow issue in the county recorder's fee statute: when multiple recordable items are combined on a single paper, recorders should be able to charge the fees that would have applied had the items been filed separately.

Cohen said: "The changes in this piece of legislation are very simple...if they are combined into 1 document, they can be charged the fees that…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans