Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House circles alimony‑standards bill after debate over cohabitation and modification rules
Summary
House debated HB36, which would codify factors for alimony including duration tied to length of marriage and limits on post‑divorce modification. Members raised concerns about cohabitation language and placement of provisions; the bill was circled for further work.
Representative Jay Hayman presented HB36 as the product of a three‑year task force seeking to put case law on alimony into statute, establishing factors courts should consider and proposing that alimony generally not exceed the length of the marriage.
Hayman listed new or clarified provisions: factors to assess standard of living at the time of divorce, limits on nominal awards, treatment of major economic changes, and a rule that alimony duration generally should not exceed marriage length. Members questioned the bill’s language on ‘‘extenuating circumstances’’ and the definition and treatment of cohabitation; Representative Carlson and others asked whether retirement or later changes in a payor’s circumstances could alter awards. Sponsors said the court that granted the divorce retains authority to revisit orders and that line 28 addresses major changes such as graduation or increased income.
Several members signaled discomfort with paragraph 9 on page 4 (cohabitation triggers); after discussion the House moved to circle the bill to allow the sponsor and members to refine the language. No final passage occurred during the session; the bill was circled for further committee or sponsor work.
