Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debate narrows proposed jump in school‑zone fines; substitute amendment adopted
Summary
Lawmakers debated steep increases to school‑zone speeding fines and a proposed substitute that reduced the maximum penalties. The House adopted the substitute amendment and subsequently held a final recorded vote on HB22.
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Norm Nielsen introduced a floor amendment to HB22 that would sharply raise fines for speeding in school zones and increase penalties for repeat offenders; he argued the change was necessary to protect children and said the result would likely make Utah among the harshest in the country.
The substitute motion, offered by Representative Goodfellow, reduced Nielsen’s proposed amounts to a three‑tier structure (first offense $100 for 21–29 mph over, $300 for 30–39 mph, $500 for 40+ mph; higher, graduated amounts on a second offense). Goodfellow framed the substitute as a compromise that would increase deterrence without imposing excessive financial burdens or creating revenue‑dependent “speed traps” for local governments.
Several members spoke for and against larger fines. Representative Nielsen cited accident totals and fatalities to argue for stronger penalties; Representative Styler and others said very high fines were disproportionate and described personal experiences with local fines and the cumulative effect of local and state penalties. Representative Baldwin supported the bill’s intent but opposed the highest proposed rates and favored the substitute as a middle ground. Members also discussed alternatives such as community service for repeat offenders.
By voice vote the House adopted the substitute amendment and reported that the bill had been taken to final vote. The floor announced the final tally for HB22 as recorded in the transcript. The next procedural step recorded in the day’s proceedings was referral to the Senate for further consideration.
