Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Udot Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House 'circles' UDOT internal performance audit bill for amendment after debate on independence and cost
Summary
Lawmakers debated HB 48, a measure to create an internal performance audit function within UDOT. Questions focused on whether UDOT already has audit authority, how independence will be protected, and a fiscal note estimating two FTEs; the House voted to 'circle' the bill for amendment and further work.
Members of the Utah House spent substantial floor time on House Bill 48, a bill presented by Representative Armont Evans to establish an internal performance-audit function inside the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). Floor debate highlighted concerns about audit independence, overlap with existing audit language, and fiscal implications.
"We're spending over $400,000,000 a year inside UDOT," Representative Evans told the chamber while explaining why an internal audit could help the department identify efficiencies. He said a task force and legislative audit found no internal performance-audit unit in UDOT and argued the bill would prompt the agency to "ask those questions of itself." Representative Evans described internal auditors as partners who can point out improvements rather than only finding fault.
Other members raised technical and structural questions. Representative Bodley noted recent reorganization legislation and asked whether existing statutory language already provided an internal-audit division; Representative Evans and others said the task force concluded the agency lacked a full internal performance-audit function. Representatives also asked whether an audit office would remain independent of the director and whether the Transportation Commission should have oversight or access to audit staff.
Representative Evans acknowledged a fiscal note estimating the need for two additional full-time positions and said funding and authorization of those FTEs would proceed through the appropriations process. Representative Stevens moved to "circle" the bill to allow for amendment; the motion carried. The body agreed to take time to prepare amendments addressing concerns — including whether one of the audit positions should be assigned to the Transportation Commission or otherwise preserve independence.
No final vote on HB 48 occurred on the floor that day; the "circle" motion means the bill is set aside for amendment and returned to committee or the sponsor for revision before returning to the calendar.
Next steps noted on the floor included consultation with the appropriations process for funding and coordination with a companion bill (HB 9) that addresses audit standards and governance.
