Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: House returns dozens of Senate amendments; key appropriations and technical measures pass

Utah House of Representatives · February 28, 1996
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Feb. 28 the Utah House quickly concurred with Senate amendments on a long consent list — including appropriations, technical fixes and professional‑licensure bills — while identifying several bills for conference. Notable items include HB68 (offender treatment appropriation reduced), HB73 (school supplies), HB94 (assistive technology), HB111 (housing trust fund appropriation) and HB64 (Opportunity Program for Education).

The House spent much of the Feb. 28 session processing a large consent sequence of Senate amendments and substitute bills. Most measures were handled as motions to concur; a handful drew brief questions from members before being adopted. Below are key items the floor processed with their floor actions and recorded tallies when available.

Votes and outcomes (selected): - House Bill 68 (offender treatment): House concurred with Senate amendment reducing an approx. $2,000,000 request to $410,000 and striking a CCJJ evaluation and a $250,000 renovation line; motion carried and bill returned to the Senate for signature (floor action recorded in early segment sequence).

- House Bill 73 (school supplies appropriations): House concurred with Senate amendment; sponsor said amount amended to $3,000,000; Representative Bigelow asked about per‑teacher effect; motion carried and bill returned to the Senate.

- House Bill 94 (assistive technology/services): House concurred with the Senate substitute that adjusted funding (sponsor cited $200,000). Motion carried (58 yes, 0 no per floor announcement) and the bill was sent back for the Senate president's signature.

- House Bill 1 11 (housing trust fund appropriation): House concurred with the Senate; sponsor described funding adjustments; recorded vote announced 265 yes, 0 no (as reported on the floor) and the bill was returned to the Senate.

- House Bill 64 (Opportunity Program for Education): House concurred with a Senate amendment that reduced a fiscal note from $3,000,000 to $450,000; motion carried (recorded on the floor: 254 yes, 7 no) and the bill was returned to the Senate.

- House Bill 80 (indigent defense cost appropriation): House concurred with a reduction from $200,000 to $100,000; motion carried and sent to Senate (reported: 59 yes, 0 no).

- Several professional‑licensing and technical cleanup bills (e.g., SB72 naturopathic licensure; SB235 engineering license amendments; SB241 architect licensing cleanup; SB129 information‑technology amendments) were moved under suspension rules and placed on the third‑reading calendar or concurred. Where floor tallies were announced, they were recorded and the bills were returned to the Senate for signature.

- House also authorized conference committee appointments on bills where the House refused to concur or differences required negotiation (e.g., local taxing authority, revenue‑bond caps). Representatives were named to meet with Senate conferees.

What this means: The consent and concurrence process permitted the House to dispatch many routine or technical matters quickly while reserving extended debate for a few high‑profile items (notably SB246 and SB253). Several bills required conference negotiations or further review and were set for follow‑up.

Provenance: The votes and motions listed above were read and processed across the floor's early sequence of segments (see provenance below). Where recorded tallies were read aloud on the floor, counts are reproduced above as reported by the Clerk.