Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mining And Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House advances resolution backing proposed Smoky Hollow coal mine after heated floor debate
Summary
The Utah House advanced a resolution supporting development of the Smoky Hollow/Kaipoli Plateau coal deposit, with proponents citing jobs and School Trust benefits and opponents warning of heavy truck traffic, local roadway costs and limited in‑state benefit. The House recorded the resolution as passed on a vote reported in the transcript.
Representative Thomas Hatch introduced a resolution supporting development of the proposed Smoky Hollow (Kaipoli/Kaipoli Plateau) coal mine and said the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining determined the proposal met applicable environmental regulations. Hatch told members who visited the site in committee that the deposit could contribute, in his account, "more than $500,000,000 annually" to the state's economy and that the School Trust has discussed land‑exchange arrangements tied to the project.
Opponents on the floor pressed transportation and local‑impact concerns. One member described a scenario of 65‑ton coal trucks on a 200‑mile shipping corridor and cited estimates for substantial road upgrades and bypass construction, warning that those costs could shift to local communities. Another questioned how many Utah jobs would result and whether much of the coal would be exported outside the state, noting the sponsor's economic estimate while saying, "I haven't seen that, but I assume that's backed up with something." The sponsor and other supporters responded that the mine would create high‑paying jobs, help struggling mining communities and that some coalfields in Carbon County are nearing exhaustion, making new development important.
Floor discussion also addressed ownership and surface disturbance. Members asked whether the mining company was foreign owned; according to the sponsor, the parent company is Dutch. Sponsors described the operation as an underground mine with a roughly 40‑acre surface footprint and two portals and said much activity would be underground, with road upgrades following existing alignments where possible.
A member called for the question, and the House moved to a recorded vote. The clerk's announcement in the transcript records the resolution as passing the body; the transcript shows a reported tally (see clarifying details). The motion was recorded as carried and the resolution was advanced to the Senate for further consideration.
The next procedural step noted on the floor was transmittal to the Senate; no further committee amendments or conditions were recorded in the transcript.
