Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health And Human Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Close vote on UCAT funding: House approves substitute bill to sustain assistive-technology center
Summary
After extended debate about replacing federal funding, the House approved substitute HB94 to maintain the Utah Center for Assistive Technology (UCAT), passing the bill 42–32. Floor discussion focused on fiscal trade-offs, program continuity and whether the state should supplant federal funds.
The Utah House on Jan. 19 narrowly approved substitute House Bill 94 to support the Utah Center for Assistive Technology (UCAT), a statewide interagency program that provides assistive devices, training and assessments to help individuals maintain independent lives and work. Representative C. Evans, the sponsor, said the federal funding the center relied upon has been phased out and the substitute bill would allow the state to supplement those services so the center could remain open.
Evans told the chamber the fiscal note totaled roughly $294,000 and explained that federal contract negotiations reduced or phased out a portion of federal dollars, creating a funding gap. He said the proposal is intended to keep the center running while other program arrangements continue.
Opponents warned the bill effectively moves federal dollars into state obligations and creates a precedent for replacing expiring federal funds with state appropriations. One member said the change could create 13 new programs using federal money that the state would later be asked to fund. Proponents countered that failing to act would scatter services across agencies and eventually cost the state more, arguing that a central UCAT reduces duplication and long-term expense.
Floor debate addressed specific dollar amounts in the fiscal note, the center’s current funding level, and whether the Legislature should prioritize these shifts in the department budget. Representative Evans and other supporters urged colleagues to support the bill to avoid service disruptions for people who need assistive technology.
The House passed the substitute bill by a recorded vote of 42–32; the measure will now move to the Senate for further consideration.
