Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Reading topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes bill to formalize early reading assessments after floor fight over kindergarten vs. first grade
Summary
The Utah House approved a substitute to House Bill 67, requiring formal reading assessments and parent-involvement plans for young students. Lawmakers debated whether testing should start in kindergarten or be postponed until first grade and adopted amendments before passing the measure 59–9.
The Utah House approved a substitute to House Bill 67 on Feb. 28, 1997, directing schools and the State Board of Education to formalize early reading assessments and set up programs to help children who are behind. The bill passed the House floor 59–9 and will be sent to the Senate.
Sponsor Jay Brent Hammond said the measure creates a systematic approach to identify students who are not at expected reading levels and provide support: "This bill provides that all children from grade 1 through 6 will be tested at the beginning of school," and he told lawmakers the program "will take approximately $250,000 to implement." Hammond said assessments would allow districts and parents to target interventions earlier.
The bill prompted an extended floor exchange over whether assessments should begin in kindergarten or be delayed to first grade. Representative Swallow offered a substitute amendment to replace the word "kindergarten" with "first grade," arguing that mandating evaluations at the kindergarten level risks "pigeonholing kids earlier than we need to" and could divert funds better used for core instruction. Opponents of that change warned that waiting could forgo early intervention opportunities and reduce parental involvement before children enter first grade.
Representative Rowan and others proposed clarifying language inserted via a pink-sheet amendment that the House adopted; sponsors said the wording reflected the State Board of Education's position and focused the law on measurable reading skills and parent resources. Supporters framed the measure as a tool for teachers and parents rather than a punitive gatekeeping test: as one member put it during debate, the bill "allows us to assess the children and get them help," and the intent is to provide materials and assistance, not to deny advancement.
Lawmakers also divided and voted on component amendments on the floor. After multiple substitute and pink-sheet amendments were considered, the House closed debate and recorded the final vote: 59 in favor and 9 opposed. With the passage, sponsors said districts and the State Board would develop assessment plans and resources to help parents support early reading. The bill now moves to the Senate for further consideration.
