Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Abortion Informed Consent topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes informed‑consent changes citing Casey; proposed 'status of fetus' amendment defeated
Summary
Substitute House Bill 362, revising informed‑consent and video provisions to align with the Supreme Court’s Casey standard and to emphasize the state’s preference for childbirth, passed the House after lengthy debate and a failed amendment to change language on describing fetal 'status.'
The Utah House voted to pass substitute House Bill 362, a package of revisions to informed‑consent language that sponsors say aligns state statute with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1992 Casey decision. The sponsor framed the changes as permissible 'persuasive measures' that may favor childbirth over abortion so long as required information is truthful and not misleading.
Sponsor Representative Kilpatrick read excerpts from Casey and described the bill as ensuring physicians provide specified information and, where applicable, a video. Kilpatrick told members the changes reflect Casey’s holding that the state may require certain disclosures if they are truthful and not misleading and if they serve to ensure a mature, informed decision.
Lawmakers debated the scope and content of the required information, including a contested amendment that would have replaced several phrases with wording referring to the 'status of the fetus.' The motion to amend that language failed on a division vote (25 yes, 40 no), as opponents argued the replacement would weaken the intended clarity of the informed‑consent requirement and supporters said it more precisely conveyed the information to be shown.
Members also aired broader constitutional and medical concerns: opponents warned the measure could invite new litigation or include material they considered speculative or inflammatory, while supporters said the proposal uses Court language and therefore should be defensible. Backers emphasized adoption clauses designed to encourage childbirth and strengthen adoption provisions.
The House recorded passage of substitute HB362 and forwarded it to the Senate with a recorded vote (55 yes, 13 no). Sponsors said they expect litigation challenges could follow but argued that the bill hews to Casey’s language and intent.
Next steps: Substitute HB362 will go to the Senate for consideration; counsel and advocates on both sides may preview constitutional briefs and potential legal challenges.
