Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Utah House rejects bill to separate civil asset forfeiture from criminal cases after heated debate
Summary
The Utah House debated House Bill 38 for more than an hour before rejecting it 30–40. Supporters said separating civil forfeiture would help law enforcement seize criminal proceeds promptly; opponents warned the change would shift burdens onto innocent owners and create perverse incentives for agencies that keep seized funds.
The Utah House of Representatives voted down House Bill 38, an attorney-general-backed measure to separate civil asset forfeiture proceedings from criminal cases, after extended floor debate and a 30–40 roll-call vote that failed to pass the chamber.
Representative Darren, who introduced the bill, said the change would allow law enforcement to pursue property believed to be the proceeds of illegal activity in civil court without waiting months for criminal convictions. “We have to confiscate that material immediately so that it puts them on notice,” the sponsor said, arguing that delaying seizure until conviction often meant the property — and the investigation — was lost.
Supporters, including Representative Curtis, framed the bill as a practical tool to strike at…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
