Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utah Tomorrow topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House amends and approves 'Utah Tomorrow' planning resolution, stresses goals not mandates

Utah House of Representatives · February 12, 1997
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House amended Senate Concurrent Resolution 2 to add the word 'increased' before 'autonomy' for schools and approved Utah Tomorrow, a long‑range planning resolution that lists department vision statements and goals but does not impose mandates; sponsors emphasized the resolution encourages long‑range budgeting rather than creating funding obligations.

The House considered Senate Concurrent Resolution 2 (the "Utah Tomorrow" long‑range planning resolution) and agreed to a floor amendment clarifying language on school autonomy.

President Allen asked leave to propose an amendment to insert the word "increased" after "school" (page 5, line 14) so the sentence would read that the Utah public education system will provide schools "increased autonomy for planning, project planning results." The motion to amend carried without opposition.

During debate members expressed concern that the resolution’s action words (such as "inventory," "identify," "maintain," "increase," "improve") could imply mandates or unfunded obligations for departments. Sponsors and supporters repeatedly clarified that the Utah Tomorrow resolution contains goals and recommendations rather than statutory mandates; departments are expected to absorb proposed activities within existing budgets or bring forward specific funding requests to the Legislature.

Representative Bradshaw (sponsor of the House’s Utah Tomorrow delegation) said the resolution grew from multi‑department input and interim committee work and urged members to view the document as a cooperative planning framework rather than a directive. After summation, the House recorded the vote and returned the measure to the Senate for further action.

Outcome: The House adopted the amendment and passed SCR2; final floor tally recorded 50 yes, 18 no. Sponsors and several members asked that committee and departmental work continue to ensure goals are practical and costed before becoming prescriptive.