Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Culture History topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves $85,000 for Utah Statehood Centennial capstone amid questions on non-lapsing language

Utah House of Representatives · February 5, 1997
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House approved a $85,000 appropriation to compile a Utah Centennial capstone volume; members questioned why the appropriation was labeled 'non-lapsing' within the general fund language and urged cleanup of the drafting; the bill passed 41–25.

First substitute H.B. 240, titled the Utah Statehood Centennial Capstone, was debated on Feb. 5 and passed the House 41–25.

Sponsor Representative Dior said the bill would appropriate $85,000 to the Division of History to compile county-by-county accounts of centennial events and statewide activities (wagon train, inaugural ceremony, multi-denominational services, etc.). Dior described the appropriation as a legacy project to preserve the centennial record.

Representative Carlson and others questioned the fiscal drafting: Carlson asked why the $85,000 in the general fund was designated as "non-lapsing," observing that "there's no such thing as non-lapsing funds in the general fund" in ordinary usage and suggesting the language be clarified or moved to the appropriate line of the appropriation section. Sponsors and floor managers agreed the wording could be revised for clarity, but the body proceeded with the bill on the floor. Representative Hickman (Rules Committee) and other speakers noted tight fiscal resources after other appropriations and indicated the appropriation should be considered in priority with other spending.

The bill passed and will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration; floor participants suggested technical cleanup of the non-lapsing language during next-stage drafting.

Ending: The House approved the appropriation and forwarded H.B. 240 to the Senate; members flagged and requested clarification of non-lapsing/general fund wording.