Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves mobile data terminals and funding for more troopers after extended debate on staffing and fiscal priorities

Utah House of Representatives · February 5, 1997
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House passed H.B. 242 to equip patrol cars with mobile data terminals and H.B. 243 to fund additional highway patrol troopers after floor debate on public safety, staffing ratios and fiscal notes; amendment attempts to alter trooper allocation failed.

Lawmakers on Feb. 5 approved two measures intended to modernize and expand the Utah Highway Patrol.

House Bill 242, sponsored by Representative Adair, would authorize purchase of mobile data terminals for patrol vehicles. Adair said the devices let troopers "quickly respond" and check registrations, transmit images and reduce paperwork; supporters noted the equipment enhances officer safety by enabling officers to confirm identities and access photographs in the field. Lawmakers acknowledged a fiscal note but argued the public-safety and efficiency benefits justify prioritizing funding. The House passed H.B. 242, recorded as 70–0.

House Bill 243 would appropriate funds to hire additional highway patrol troopers. Sponsors described staffing shortages across the state as a public-safety concern, citing sharply increased vehicle miles traveled since the 1970s while trooper numbers rose only modestly. Several amendments were offered on the floor — including one to shift the 40 requested troopers to 30 plus 10 designated DUI troopers — but amendment motions were defeated after members urged the department to retain allocation authority. Supporters emphasized that the fiscal note provides ongoing funding and urged lawmakers to prioritize the appropriation. The House recorded H.B. 243 as passed, with the roll showing 67–0.

Both bills were forwarded to the Senate for further action; floor discussion emphasized implementation would depend on appropriations and future budgeting decisions.

Ending: The measures passed the House and were sent to the Senate; sponsors and several members called for prioritizing funding in later budget decisions.