Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House advances HB35 to allow an optional 'fifth term' for accelerated and remedial instruction; fiscal questions raised

Utah House of Representatives · January 31, 1997
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House debated H.B. 35, a substantive education bill that would create an optional fifth (summer) term for acceleration, remediation or concurrent college/technical credit; sponsors called it voluntary and potentially cost-saving long-term, while members and fiscal analysts raised near-term cost concerns and implementation questions.

Representatives Lloyd W. Fransen and Wright presented H.B. 35, an education measure that would authorize school districts to offer an optional "fifth term" (a summer or supplementary 45‑day term) intended for acceleration, remediation or concurrent college/technical enrollment. Sponsors described the proposal as voluntary, not year‑round schooling, and said it would let students accelerate (possibly earning college credit), provide remediation, and improve building utilization.

Representative Wright summarized the policy as offering "a fifth term" and emphasized that it is "strictly voluntary for those that would like to participate" and "not year round school." Supporters said the approach could let students complete more coursework sooner and provide flexibility for teachers.

Several members pressed the sponsors on cost and implementation. A member cited a fiscal note suggesting—if limited participation were assumed—costs of about $1.1 million for a small pilot; sponsors said they planned to tap experimental and developmental program monies in the appropriations bill to seed the program while districts that choose to participate would bear implementation costs. Proponents also referenced a 600‑family survey they commissioned in which 36% said they were "very interested" and 39% "somewhat interested," which sponsors cited as evidence of community support.

The transcript records extended debate on practical issues—remediation vs. acceleration, fee schedules and whether fees would be borne by districts—and shows the House moved to vote; the provided segments record that the bill passed the House and will be referred to the Senate, but a precise roll-call tally for final passage is not specified in the included segments.