Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House repeals escrow requirement on disputed property taxes after extended debate
Summary
On July 16, 1997 the House passed Senate Bill 2,002 to repeal the escrow requirement that had required counties to deposit 100% of disputed tax amounts; the vote was 58–14 after floor debate about budget impacts, valuation difficulties for centrally assessed businesses, and potential burden shifts to homeowners.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House members debated Senate Bill 2,002, which removes from statute the escrow requirement added earlier in House Bill 129 that forced counties to escrow 100% of disputed tax amounts when a taxpayer appealed an assessment. The sponsor explained the repeal would eliminate the mandated upfront escrow and the automatic certified-rate increase tied to that escrowed amount.
During debate, Representatives raised policy trade-offs. One lawmaker argued the escrow law raised tax rates up front and shifted costs to taxpayers because counties increased certified rates to preserve budgets when large disputed amounts were escrowed. "Under 129 the tax is raised upfront," a presenter said, arguing that requiring full escrow caused an immediate rate increase that affected homeowners and small businesses. Other members called the repeal a temporary "band aid" and urged a fuller review of valuation methodology and longer-term fixes for centrally assessed property valuation.
Multiple speakers proposed alternatives including partial escrow (25%) as a compromise; the sponsor responded that selecting a single percentage could mask the underlying valuation problem and that the repeal preserves counties'options to escrow voluntarily while avoiding a mandatory statewide requirement. A central technical concern in the debate was whether repeal would produce an immediate shift of tax burden from businesses to homeowners in 1997; sponsors stated that passing SB2002 would prevent the immediate shift for 1997, though a later court or tax-commission determination could still create a delayed shift.
After extended questioning and explanation, the House voted to pass Senate Bill 2,002 by a margin of 58 yes to 14 no. The sponsor and others noted the repeal retains other features of House Bill 129 (expedited appeal processing and judgment-levy provisions) while only removing the escrow mandate.
