Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Approves Bill Setting Olympic Security Command Structure After Contentious Amendments Debate
Summary
First substitute SB 159, which lays out a statewide command and coordination structure for Olympic venue security and funding transfers, passed the House after extended debate over which agencies and local officials should sit on the planning/command committee; vote was 39–27.
The Utah House debated and passed first substitute Senate Bill 159 on March 4, 1998, a measure shaped to establish a command structure and funding parameters for planning security and operations related to the Olympics. Sponsor remarks emphasized lessons from Atlanta and the need for a single commander and clear planning authority: "What we're doing here is ... establish where that buck stops and that is with the commander that will actually head up the entire group," a floor sponsor said.
A prolonged floor fight focused on the committee's membership. One amendment would have added the Olympic coordinator, the League of Cities and Towns, and local public‑works representatives to the committee while removing Ogden City police and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) from specified slots. Proponents argued the change would broaden operational expertise beyond law enforcement; opponents—including the bill sponsor—said the existing compromise closely reflected a year-and-a-half of negotiation and that adding more appointed seats would undercut coordination and invite federal agencies to be excluded from planning.
Representatives debated operational logistics for venues (for example, Snow Basin events in Ogden City) and whether local agencies needed a seat on the statewide command. Supporters of the amendment said local emergency-management, fire and public-works expertise matters for on-the-ground response; the sponsor and backers argued that adding too many stakeholders would clog an incident-command structure and risk undermining federal coordination (including FBI/ATF participation).
The House adopted a substitute motion narrowing two contested items in the amendment (deleting items 2 and 3 as presented) and then passed the underlying bill by a recorded margin of 39 yes to 27 no. Members expressed urgency that a unified security planning structure be put in place to coordinate state, local and federal resources well before the Games.
