Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government Townships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves changes to township law that reaffirm county control and add notification rights
Summary
The House passed House Bill 2,001 on July 16, 1997, amending local government law to clarify townships are county functions, add notification rights for incorporations/annexations, and set standards for future township creation; the bill passed the House 69–3 and was transmitted to the Senate.
Sponsoring Representative Melvin R. Brown introduced House Bill 2,001 as a rewrite of the state's local government law aimed at clarifying the legal status and procedures for townships. "A township is not another level of government," Brown said, urging colleagues to view the measure as a way for local areas to exercise zoning and planning while remaining functions of county government.
The bill makes several substantive changes: it affirms townships operate under county oversight rather than as independent political subdivisions; it requires counties to notify township planning boards when incorporation or annexation petitions affect township boundaries so the township can comment; it adopts standards for creating future townships (including petition thresholds) and lowers one incorporation-petition standard to one-third of property owners from a majority; and it requires feasibility studies to consider local service costs and tax-base impacts.
Representatives questioned technical elements of the bill during floor debate. One lawmaker asked whether the 20% to 80% threshold for private land area or locally assessed value (a dual standard in the bill) would exclude some rural or mountain areas with large amounts of public land; Brown replied the standard mirrors prior multiple-planning-district language and is intended to prevent proliferation of ineffective, very small planning entities. Another question focused on whether municipal services such as water and sewer are considered "governmental services" for feasibility studies; the sponsor said costs for those services must be included in the feasibility analysis but the bill does not require a new city to assume existing service district bonds or operations.
After questions and a sponsor summation, voting opened. House Bill 2,001 passed the House 69 yes to 3 no and was referred to the Senate; Senate action was later reported and the bill was signed into the journal on July 16, 1997.
