Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Tax Relief topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes bill raising circuit-breaker exemption for low-income senior homeowners

Utah House of Representatives · February 24, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House on Feb. 24 approved substitute House Bill 425 to increase the residential exemption for circuit-breaker property-tax relief from 45% to 65% for qualifying elderly and fixed‑income homeowners; the bill passed the House 72‑0 and will go to the Senate.

The Utah House of Representatives approved substitute House Bill 425 on Feb. 24, a measure that raises the residential exemption used to calculate circuit‑breaker property‑tax relief for seniors and fixed‑income homeowners from 45% to 65%. Sponsor Representative Raymond W. Short framed the bill as targeted relief for elderly Utahns on fixed incomes who have seen large property‑valuation increases in recent years and said the change would roughly restore taxes to levels from “about 4 or 5 years ago.”

Supporters said the change spreads the cost across all taxpayers but is necessary to help the most vulnerable homeowners. Representative Kathleen Carlson urged members to support the bill, calling it “a very fair approach” that shares the cost of protecting endangered homeowners. Opponents did not press substantive objections on the floor during the debate; members asked technical questions about fiscal impacts and statute citations and the sponsor accepted a clerical correction to statutory references on the pink‑sheet amendment.

Representative Short described the policy detail: qualifying households that are eligible for the circuit‑breaker relief would see the residential exemption increase from 45% to 65% under the bill’s language, which the sponsor said would reduce tax bills for affected homeowners. Members queried the fiscal note; the sponsor answered that, for a $150,000 house, the effect would be about $4 (as discussed on the floor) and that the bill’s costs would be prioritized with other budget requests.

After final remarks, the House opened the vote and the Clerk announced that House Bill 425 passed the House by a recorded vote of 72 yes, 0 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.

The next procedural step is Senate consideration; the bill’s fiscal impacts will be reconciled in the budget process if the Senate proceeds with the measure.