Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workers Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves broad workers27 compensation reforms after lengthy debate
Summary
The House passed Fifth Substitute HB167, a package of workers27 compensation amendments negotiated with insurers, employers and the state fund. Debate centered on definitions, out-of-state services, reserve levels and a failed push to study privatization; the bill passed unanimously and moves to the Senate.
The Utah House on Feb. 27 approved Fifth Substitute House Bill 167, a negotiated package of reforms to the state27s workers27 compensation framework aimed at clarifying what the Fund may offer and how it operates domestically and in other states.
Jerry A. Adair, sponsor of the bill, told members the measure reflects months of work with insurers, manufacturers and the Workers27 Compensation Fund. He described the changes as clarifying the Fund27s authority to provide "workers' compensation products and services," including administrative services (medical and claims management, utilization review and loss-prevention consulting), and spelled out when the Fund may participate in joint ventures or offer services beyond Utah.
Adair said the Fund holds substantial reserves and that state oversight would remain: "The information that I have is the workers' comp has about $400,000,000 for the coverage of claims, and they have an additional hundred and $79,000,000 in reserves," he said on the floor, adding regulators told him $23,000,000 would be a very minimum reserve that would prompt investigation.
Members debated several amendments. Representative Alexander successfully moved language defining a "Utah employer" (headquartered in Utah or with the majority of employees in the state) so that the Fund27s ability to offer services in other states would not be unrestricted. Another floor amendment that would have directed an interim committee to study privatization of the Fund drew extensive argument and was ruled failed by the chair after a recorded vote.
Supporters described the bill as a consensus compromise that reasserts legislative oversight while allowing the Fund to operate as a carrier of last resort; opponents urged caution about potential liabilities and the scope of services. After debate and amendment, the House voted to pass the fifth substitute (roll call reported 70 yes, 0 no). The bill will now go to the Senate for further consideration.
The sponsor said the intent was to protect employers and employees by clarifying permissible activities and protecting reserves while maintaining the Fund27s provider-of-last-resort role. Next steps for the bill are Senate consideration and, if passed there, enrollment and signature by the governor.
