Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transit Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House OKs Bill Letting UTA Provide Service Outside Districts as Last Resort
Summary
House Bill 238 passed 67–2 after sponsor said the measure allows the Utah Transit Authority to operate outside its service district only when local and commercial options are exhausted; Q&A on who may request service and Olympic planning highlighted the debate.
Get email alerts on the Transit Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Ron Bigelow, sponsor of House Bill 238, told the chamber the bill's purpose is narrow: it allows a transit district such as the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) to operate buses outside its service district only under strict procedures and only after local entities and commercial providers decline or cannot supply requested service. "This allows UTA to provide bus service, for example, during the Olympics if it's certified that no commercial entity nor local government can provide that service," Bigelow said.
Members asked whether the Olympics or an Olympic authority had requested the change. Bigelow said no outside Olympic authority had requested it and that the provision arose from a task force discussion as a way to ensure transit options are available when local and commercial capacity is lacking. Representatives pressed who would initiate a request: Bigelow said the bill defines the requester as a "bureau" (recreational, tourist or convention bureau representing the area) and explained that the requester must follow a prescribed sequence—first try local providers, then commercial providers—before petitioning UTA. "UTA is... the place of last resort," Bigelow said.
Representative Short, who chaired the task clause cited by the sponsor, argued it would be unwise to prohibit UTA from providing service in situations where local capacity is insufficient, noting that bringing buses in from out of state while leaving parked in-state buses idle would be inefficient. Others asked whether the bill automatically requires UTA involvement; sponsor and supporters stressed it does not.
After limited debate the House closed discussion and the bill was passed, 67–2, and forwarded to the Senate.
