Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House narrowly approves ban on fusion candidates, HB 75 passes 54–50
Summary
House Bill 75, which would bar candidates from appearing on the ballot as representatives of more than one political party, passed the Utah House 54–50 after proponents cited a Supreme Court decision and opponents warned it could limit political expression.
Representative Joseph G. Murray, sponsor of House Bill 75, told the chamber the bill would prohibit a candidate from appearing on the ballot as a member of more than one political party, arguing the change would reduce voter confusion and preserve party integrity.
Murray cited the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party and read portions of the opinion to the House, saying state law can limit fusion to prevent ballots from becoming “a billboard for political advertising.” He said the measure does not prevent candidates from running; it only prevents a candidate from appearing on the ballot as representing multiple parties.
Opponents raised constitutional and practical concerns. One member said the bill “seems like we're trying to limit what a candidate can do” and asked how the restriction advances voter choice. Proponents responded that multiple-party listings can cause voter confusion and ballot errors.
After debate and summation, the House voted 54 in favor and 50 opposed to pass HB 75. Members for and against framed the issue as a choice between ballot clarity and broader party endorsements.
Next steps: HB 75 will be forwarded to the Senate for consideration.
