Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Civil Rights topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah House passes traffic-stop data bill to collect racial-profiling statistics after wide debate

Utah House of Representatives · January 23, 2001
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 199, creating a statewide traffic-stop inquiry database to evaluate racial profiling and tasking the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice with review, passed the House 58–16 after extended floor debate over cost, categories for race, and potential chilling effects on policing.

After extensive floor debate, the Utah House on a 58–16 vote approved House Bill 199, a measure to collect traffic-stop and inquiry data to evaluate allegations of racial profiling and to provide that information to the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ).

Representative Bordeaux, sponsor of HB 199, defended the bill’s fiscal estimate and policy intent, telling lawmakers the fiscal note was “approximately $8,000” and that the proposal had law-enforcement and Attorney General support. Opponents and questioners challenged whether the state’s $8,000 fiscal note would cover implementation costs borne by local agencies and pointed to other states’ programs that ran into far higher expenses.

Lawmakers also debated technical details such as whether the database should encode the Census Bureau’s detailed race categories, whether the legislation should include state identification cards or only driver’s licenses, and whether maintaining such a database would have a “chilling effect” on routine policing. Representative Parker moved to circle the bill to review fiscal impacts; that motion failed and the body proceeded. Representative Wei recounted local examples and said review of ticket rolls had identified suspected patterns: “In fact, over 80% of those tickets that he had written, the last name happened to end with an ez,” she said as an illustration of why data collection is necessary.

Supporters said that without data officials would have nothing to analyze and that CCJJ would evaluate patterns, adjust for local demographics, and work with law enforcement on remedies or training where appropriate. Opponents warned that statistics could be misinterpreted without contextual benchmarking for neighborhood demographics. After debate, the House approved HB 199 by a roll-call vote and forwarded it to the Senate for consideration.