Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Drug Lab Decontamination topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes bill setting standards and certification for drug-lab decontamination; members debate costs and local authority

Utah House of Representatives · January 22, 2001
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB 6 creates a certification program and authorizes rulemaking for decontamination of illegal drug labs; sponsors said it protects public health and property owners, while some members warned of potential costs and local timetable pressures. The House passed the bill 49–26.

The Utah House passed House Bill 6, which creates statewide standards and a certification program for contractors and inspectors who decontaminate properties used for illegal drug manufacturing, and referred the measure to the Senate.

Representative Lamont Tyler, the sponsor, said the bill’s central provision (section 19-6-906) sets up certification for decontamination contractors and inspectors and authorizes the Department of Environmental Quality, in consultation with the Department of Health and local health officers, to prepare rules for best practices. "The heart of this bill is in section 19-6-906... which sets up a program for certification of decontamination contractors and inspectors," Tyler told the House.

Tyler said the Department of Environmental Quality would establish a course—likely offered in collaboration with a local community college—for contractors and inspectors; those who completed the course and an exam would be certified. Under the bill, most operational responsibilities such as posting notices, hearings and appeals remain with local health departments, Tyler said.

Floor amendments were adopted to soften a mandatory refresher requirement and to require rules to balance the interests of public health and private property owners. Representative Swallow moved to change a required annual refresher from "shall" to "may," giving the Department discretion; Tyler said he had no objection and the amendment passed. Swallow also successfully moved language requiring that rules "shall balance the interests of the public and private property owners."

Debate on the bill centered on two themes: public-health protections for future occupants and the protection of property owners from excessive costs or overreaching local rules. Supporters described the measure as a practical public-health safeguard that also helps property owners obtain formal certification that a property has been decontaminated; opponents warned that local boards could impose timelines or procedures that create significant expense and that the bill does not itself create a funding mechanism to reimburse local health departments for enforcement or monitoring costs.

Tyler offered an illustrative cost figure for contractor certification he had heard in committee: about $200 to $250 for a contractor to become certified. He said that if a contractor cleans a dozen properties in a year, the per-job pass-through would be modest. Representative Clark attempted an amendment to change fee-deposit language so fees collected would be distributed to sections 3, 4 and 6 to help local public health departments recover costs; counsel advised this was not permissible and the amendment failed on a floor vote.

After summation and waiver of further debate, the House voted to pass HB 6 as amended; the clerk recorded 49 yes votes and 26 no votes. The bill will be referred to the Senate for consideration.

Next steps: DEQ will prepare rule language (subject to public comment and legislative review) establishing best practices and certification procedures; local boards of health retain implementation authority for posting, hearings and timeframes.