Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Disability Services Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves appropriation to centralize disability-services training
Summary
Lawmakers passed HB 47 to fund long-term professional development for disability services, directing funds to the Utah State Center for People with Disabilities to administer RFPs for job-coach, interpreter and behavior-specialist training. The bill passed 61–10 and was forwarded for further consideration.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah House approved House Bill 47 on Jan. 18, a measure that would fund long-term professional development for disability services and assign administration of grants to the Utah State Center for People with Disabilities.
Representative David Hogue, sponsor, said the appropriation would be used for coordinated training through request-for-proposal grants so departments and organizations could avoid duplication and improve service quality. "This bill proposes that the appropriation would go to the Utah State Center for People with Disabilities to manage those funds in a way that they would require RFPs for grants to do the training," Hogue said during his floor presentation.
The sponsor and supporting members cited workforce shortages in specialist roles, noting an unmet need for interpreters for the deaf and job coaches to support supported employment. Representative Hogue referenced estimates used in debate: requests for roughly 50 supported-employment personnel, 50 certified interpreters and other specialized staff to meet current ADA and state-code requirements for interpreter services in judicial and health settings.
Several representatives said the bill could save money by improving coordination; others pressed for the appropriations process and prioritization to determine funding. Representative Throckmorton asked that prioritization be considered and questioned whether the bill should be heard in appropriations, given the state’s larger waiting-list funding needs. Multiple members disclosed personal or familial connections to services that would benefit from the bill and asked to have those conflicts noted in the record.
After debate and a successful non-debatable motion to end debate, the House closed voting and the clerk announced House Bill 47 received 61 yes votes and 10 no votes and passed the body. The clerk’s announcement recorded the bill as "passed in this body" and referred for further consideration as recorded in the session transcript.
What happens next: The bill will proceed according to legislative procedure for final disposition and any appropriations prioritization that may occur later in the session.
