Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Victim Reparations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects substitute to alter victim-reparations distribution and returns to original Senate bill
Summary
Representative Hogue proposed a substitute to Senate Bill 5,002 that would reinstate earlier distribution language and reduce the percentage going to the reparations trust so $1.5 million could be used in the general fund. Opponents warned it would permanently reduce funds available to victims; the substitute motion failed and the House returned to the original Senate bill for further consideration.
Representative Hogue presented a substitute to Senate Bill 5,002 intended to reinstate original distribution language and reduce the share going to the victim reparations trust in order to free $1.5 million for the general fund. Hogue said his substitute would hold the reparations trust harmless at $14,000,000 while allowing certain administrative and programmatic needs to be funded from other sources.
Opponents, including Representative (speaker labeled in transcript as S26 and Representative Bigelow), urged caution. One member argued the substitute made the change permanent and “robs the victim restitution fund,” urging public hearings and consultation with the victim reparations office before making a permanent statutory change.
Representative Hogue and supporters said the substitute was intended as a measured change that could accomplish required balancing while preserving reparations where possible. After debate and summation, the motion to substitute was put to a vote and failed; the House returned to consideration of the original Senate bill on the floor.
Why it matters: The debate concerns the allocation of fees and fines intended for victim restitution versus uses the House is considering to balance the general fund. Opponents urged fuller input from the victim-reparations office and public hearings before making permanent law changes affecting victims.
