Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates transfer of $17 million in tobacco-settlement funds to balance budget; lawmakers split over education and security
Summary
On July 9, 2002 the Utah House debated House Bill 5,014, a proposal to transfer $17 million from the permanent tobacco-settlement trust fund to the general fund to help close a $173 million shortfall. Lawmakers clashed over using one-time money to shore up education versus funding homeland-security and criminal-justice needs; a large amendment failed and the bill moved to final votes.
Get email alerts on the State Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on July 9, 2002 opened lengthy debate on House Bill 5,014, a measure to transfer $17,000,000 from the permanent tobacco-settlement trust fund into the state general fund to help balance a projected deficit.
Representative James Alexander, sponsor of the bill, told colleagues the transfer was part of a broader package to close a roughly $173 million shortfall, saying the plan combines cuts, use of tobacco funds, bonding and transfers from the Centennial Highway Fund to meet the gap.
Representative Karianne Morgan moved an amendment to increase the transfer to $27,349,900 and framed the change as a way to protect education and services for vulnerable Utahns. “We are cutting funding to the blind and the visually impaired,” Morgan said, urging colleagues to consider the specific program cuts the amendment would address.
The proposal prompted several counterarguments. Representative Mike Hutchings offered a substitute motion to raise the transfer to $18,500,000 to cover one-time homeland-security costs, arguing that “we need $200,000 to go in to cover hazardous materials emergency-response training” and $500,000 to establish a joint terrorism task force; he framed those as one-time needs that match the use of one-time revenue.
Representative Ralph Becker criticized the broader package and the reliance on one-time money for ongoing priorities. “This is, I think, a sad day in Utah,” Becker said in a pointed floor statement, warning that deep cuts to education and vulnerable populations in the budget will have real effects on students, elderly residents and disabled Utahns.
After debate, the House put Morgan’s larger amendment to a vote; the motion to delete $17,800,000 and insert $27,349,900 failed. The floor then proceeded toward a final vote on House Bill 5,014; voting was open at the time the House recessed for a short break.
Why it matters: The bill illustrates the trade-offs facing the special session — whether to use one-time settlement dollars to shield classroom programs and social services or to prioritize security and corrections needs. Lawmakers repeatedly described the change as a temporary, one-time fix that could complicate next year’s budget if replacement revenues are not found.
The House prepared to vote on the bill after the recess; the record in the transcript shows the amendment vote failed and that the bill moved to the voting stage.
