Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Taxation Trusts Estates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House advances First Substitute Senate Bill 37 to clarify taxation of trusts and estates

Utah House of Representatives · February 27, 2006
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House approved First Substitute Senate Bill 37, a technical and substantive rewrite clarifying income-tax treatment for individuals, estates and trusts; sponsor said it incorporates previously omitted code sections and technical amendments and the bill passed the House unanimously on the floor vote reported.

The Utah House on Feb. 27 approved First Substitute Senate Bill 37, a measure that rewrites and clarifies how trusts and estates are treated under the state income tax code.

Representative Harper, speaking for the bill, said the measure was returned to the House to incorporate two sections of code and several technical amendments that had been omitted during an earlier passage. "What it does is clarify how trust and estates are done," Harper said, explaining the substitute was intended to ensure the income tax code's trust section is fully integrated.

Representative Hartler noted accountants and trust attorneys had worked with the Tax Review Commission on the rewrite for about two years to ensure the code sections were properly captured. The sponsor waived summation and the House opened the vote on the substitute. The Clerk announced the substitute had received 55 yes votes and 0 no votes; the bill passed the House and was referred to the Senate for further consideration.

What happens next: The substitute will be transmitted to the Senate where it may be considered and amended. The House recorded the vote in the chamber as 55–0 in favor of the substitute.

Details on specific code sections and technical corrections were discussed on the floor but not read into the record in full; the sponsor indicated staff and subject-matter experts (specialty accountants and trust attorneys) contributed to the rewrite.