Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Park Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Converse parks commission discusses permanent restrooms for Schumann Park, requests cost estimates
Summary
Commissioners discussed replacing porta-potties at Schumann Park with permanent restrooms or interim handwashing stations; staff said a permanent building and sewer extension could cost about $100,000 (estimate) and agreed to place the item on the December agenda for pricing and further review.
The Converse Parks and Recreation Commission on Nov. 4 discussed whether to replace porta-potties at Schumann Park with a permanent restroom facility, and commissioners asked staff to return with cost estimates for the next meeting.
Orlando Crews, a commission member, opened the discussion by noting the park’s current "restroom situation at Schumann Park is just porta potties," and asked the commission to consider a more permanent solution such as a sewer connection or septic system. Parks and Grounds Foreman Keith Taylor said installing a building and extending sewer service would be a long-term project and suggested a ballpark figure: "you're looking at probably 100,000," which he delivered as an estimate.
Assistant City Manager Naina Nixon Mendez reminded the commission of a February prioritization exercise that placed restrooms alongside road signage, a community pantry, playscape, solar lighting and a community garden in the park’s ranked needs. Nixon Mendez said the city’s park-plan update and budgeting process—expected to begin after the city takes a contract to council in December—could incorporate this feedback.
Commissioners discussed lower-cost interim steps, including adding another porta-potty and a hand-washing station to improve sanitation while the commission or city explores a permanent solution. The commission agreed to add the topic to the Dec. 9 meeting agenda and requested that Keith Taylor bring back pricing and options so the body can make a more informed decision.
No formal vote or appropriation was made at the meeting; commissioners framed the item as a discussion to gather information and plan possible future action.
