Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes supplemental appropriation after fractious debate over $480 million federal transit opportunity
Summary
House members amended and approved the Senate’s supplemental appropriations bill (SB3) after intense floor debate about language tied to a Salt Lake County light-rail project and who should pay ongoing operating costs; SB3 passed 51–23.
On March 3 the Utah House brought Senate Bill 3 (Supplemental Appropriations Act) from rules, adopted technical amendments and debated attached Goldenrod intent language that would signal state support for an approximately $480 million federal transit grant for Salt Lake County light-rail.
Representative Alexander presented amendments that balanced line items and replaced a Utah Sports Authority reference with an Olympic special revenue account. Lawmakers then debated whether the House should include intent language that would commit the state or particular jurisdictions to cover operating costs for the proposed light-rail project.
Supporters argued the federal opportunity is a rare, large capital grant and that sending a firm intent that operating funds would be identified would improve the project’s prospect for federal funding. Opponents said the project primarily benefits Salt Lake County and urged that the county or local beneficiaries should assume operating costs and that the House should not pre-commit statewide resources.
Representative Pat Johnson summarized the dilemma: though personally unsympathetic to light rail, he opposed measures that would jeopardize the federal funding opportunity, calling it “a gift” the state should not refuse. Representative Chard and others won a partial change in intent language that narrowed the definition of the paying area from a broad UTA service area to Salt Lake County in one amendment, but other proposed deletions of intent language failed. After votes on several amendments the House passed SB3 as amended (51 yes, 23 no) and the bill was referred back to the Senate.
The vote sets a path for the state to deliver supplemental appropriations and signals continued negotiations among local, state and federal partners about capital and operating responsibility for a major transit project.
