Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves $100 at‑home parent tax credit after extended debate
Summary
Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 62, a $100 nonrefundable income tax credit for a stay‑at‑home parent with children under 12 and household income limits; the measure passed 42–29 amid debate over fiscal impact and funding source (Uniform School Fund vs. General Fund replacement).
The Utah House passed Senate Bill 62 on Feb. 25, 1999, creating a $100 state income tax credit for an eligible at‑home parent of a child under 12 in households with joint earnings up to $50,000. The vote was 42 yes and 29 no.
Sponsor Representative Dayton described the credit as a symbolic and policy signal to support parents who choose to stay home during the early formative years. Under the bill as explained on the floor, the stay‑at‑home parent’s own reported wages (W‑2 plus Schedule C earnings) must total no more than $3,000; the family’s joint earnings must be $50,000 or less to be eligible. The credit is nonrefundable, so taxpayers who pay no state income tax will not receive cash back.
Opponents criticized the bill as a “feel‑good” measure with limited direct impact on needy families and flagged funding concerns: the fiscal calculations and source evolved during amendment (the full fiscal note had been higher in earlier drafts). Sponsor Dayton and others explained that the credit’s cost would be met by the Uniform School Fund but that the bill contains intent language that the General Fund will replace Uniform School Fund revenues for this credit; lawmakers debated how binding that replacement is in future years.
Several members urged caution over taking money from the Uniform School Fund (or replacing it annually from General Fund appropriations), arguing that education budgets are already strained. Supporters countered that the credit is modest ($500,000 in total appropriation cited on the floor) and sends a policy signal valuing parental care.
The House adopted the measure and transmitted it to the Senate for further action.
Next steps: SB 62 will be considered by the Senate; the floor record shows questions remain about long‑term funding and whether the credit’s intent language creates an enforceable replacement obligation.
