Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves pollution-control sales-tax exemption after hours of debate

Utah House of Representatives · February 26, 1999
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 76 to extend a sales-tax exemption for pollution-control equipment, citing environmental and economic benefits; opponents raised process and budget concerns about tax-exemption proliferation.

After extended floor debate, the Utah House approved Senate Bill 76, a sales-tax exemption for pollution-control equipment, by a recorded vote of 60 to 9.

Sponsor Representative Curtis described the bill as "the long awaited pollution control tax bill," saying it grants a sales-tax exemption for pollution-control equipment and carries a fiscal note of $6,000,000 with a sunset date in February 2004. He opened the floor for questions and debate, noting the Department of Environmental Quality supported continuation of the exemption for equipment used to meet permitting requirements.

Opponents raised concerns about the growing number and fiscal impact of tax exemptions. Representative Carlson said Utah already grants hundreds of millions in tax exemptions annually and asked for a systematic process to evaluate which exemptions are justified. Other members warned that carving out special exemptions shifts tax burdens elsewhere and urged periodic legislative review.

Proponents argued the exemption helps existing Utah businesses invest and upgrade pollution-control systems; Representative Throck Martin and others presented economic reasoning that exemptions can spur business investment and ultimately broaden the tax base. Supporters also emphasized that the bill contains a sunset clause requiring review in 2004 and that earlier studies (including a study cited by the legislative fiscal analyst) found the exemption justified for some firms.

The House closed debate and recorded a roll-call vote: Senate Bill 76 passed 60–9 and was read by title and signed for transmittal. Members said the legislation would be revisited under the sunset provision.

Next steps: SB76 was signed by the Speaker and transmitted to the Senate for further action as required by the concurrence procedure.