Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Parity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves delayed mental‑health parity bill after extended debate, 38–31
Summary
After sustained floor debate over costs and coverage, the Utah House on Feb. 23 passed amended House Bill 159 requiring certain mental‑health coverage; the bill passed 38–31 and includes a delayed implementation date of July 2000 to allow stakeholder negotiations.
House Bill 159, proposing insurance coverage parity for mental‑health treatment, passed the House 38–31 on Feb. 23 after extended debate.
Sponsor (identified on the floor as Representative Buckmeyer/Buffmeier) framed the bill as necessary to address unmet needs and to bring mental‑health treatment into parity with physical health care. "Whether illnesses, mental illness is an illness. I urge you to support this bill," one proponent said during debate. Supporters described personal experience with loss and argued untreated mental illness imposes large social and fiscal costs.
Opponents warned of possible premium increases for small businesses and noted a lack of precise cost estimates. Representative Chard and others asked which insurance plans would be affected; the sponsor clarified that ERISA plans governed by federal law would not be altered by this state law and that the primary impact would be on state‑regulated plans and smaller employers. Members referenced a fiscal note estimating state costs (one member cited approximately $3,000,000 for state employees) and warned that small businesses could face premium increases; the sponsor and proponents pointed to a delayed implementation date (July 2000) to allow negotiation and further study.
Procedural actions: the previous question was invoked to cut off debate; the bill’s final passage tally was 38 yes and 31 no. The sponsor emphasized the implementation delay to convene stakeholders and refine the approach before the law takes effect.
Next steps: HB 159 will be transmitted to the Senate. Sponsors signaled an intent to continue negotiations and, if necessary, return with revised language in a future session.
