Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Credit Unions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes second-substitute SB 237 tightening rules for credit-union branching

Utah House of Representatives · February 23, 1999
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House on Feb. 23 approved second substitute SB 237, changing credit-union branching rules and clarifying the "meaningful affinity" membership standard; the bill passed 67–0 and will be referred to the Senate. Sponsors said the measure preserves both banks and credit unions while directing the state financial commissioner to apply the law narrowly.

Second substitute Senate Bill 237, a set of changes to the Utah Credit Union Act, passed the House 67–0 on Feb. 23 and will be sent to the Senate.

Representative Garn, the sponsor, described the package as a negotiated, consensus measure agreed to by both banks and credit unions and said the amendment approved on the floor — Amendment No. 3 — prevents credit unions from opening branches in a non‑domicile county unless they meet the statutory requirements included in the bill. "It's an amendment that was agreed upon by both the banks and the credit unions," Garn said on the floor.

The sponsor framed the bill as protecting both industries while preserving the tax‑preferred status and the cooperative nature of credit unions. "From this point forward, banks should not take action that obstructs credit unions operating under this new law. And likewise, credit unions should be careful to operate within the letter and the spirit of the new law," Garn said. He urged the state department of financial institutions to interpret the law narrowly and to apply the meaningful‑affinity rules consistently.

Several members declared conflicts of interest before the final vote; the presiding officer noted he worked for Zions Bank Corporation and other members reported bank or industry ties. The House elected to spread intent language on the bill into the House Journal, and Representative Uhr moved that the intent language be entered on the record; that motion was adopted.

Action taken: the House substituted a second substitute for the first substitute, adopted Amendment No. 3 under Representative Garn's name, and then passed the bill by voice/vote tally (67 yes, 0 no). The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.

Next steps: the bill goes to the Senate. If enacted, the law directs the state commissioner of financial institutions to apply the meaningful‑affinity membership rules narrowly and to monitor potential cross‑industry conflicts.