Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House debates sunsetting hospital assessment tied to tobacco settlement; bill set aside for further work
Summary
Lawmakers debated House Bill 284, which would repeal the Medicaid hospital-provider temporary assessment tax if state tobacco-settlement payments materialize; supporters said it would relieve hospitals and patients, while opponents called the timing premature and sought safeguards for CHIP funding.
Representative Margaret Dayton, sponsor of House Bill 284, told the House the bill would sunset the Medicaid hospital-provider temporary assessment tax when tobacco settlement payments become available and that doing so "would not jeopardize the CHIP program as it would not go into effect until that money was here." She described the hospital assessment as a tax on "unwanted illness and injury" and urged its elimination once an alternative revenue source exists.
Opponents pressed that the legislature cannot presume the arrival, timing, or size of tobacco-settlement receipts. Representative Alexander argued the chamber should not earmark funds before payments are certain and urged waiting until the amounts are known. Representative Hogue and others said removing the assessment prematurely could disrupt the funding balance for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and recommended careful interim study.
Much of the debate turned on two linked concerns: (1) how much tobacco-settlement revenue Utah might receive (Representative Dayton cited optimistic figures of about $35,000,000 annually in some estimates) and (2) whether the bill's amendments ensured that sufficient funds would be reserved to maintain CHIP. An amendment in committee set a condition that the repeal would occur only if an initial tobacco payment was at least $5,500,000; Representative Throckmorton raised concerns about that specific threshold and moved to strike it, later withdrawing the motion after discussion.
Members also considered procedural motions. A two-thirds motion to cut off debate failed, preserving continued discussion. Later, Representative Uhr moved to "circle" (set aside) the bill to allow further work on compromise language; the motion to circle passed by voice vote, and the bill was set aside for additional refinement rather than advanced to final passage that day.
The discussion recorded several technical and policy points: sponsor Dayton said the bill does not assume control of all tobacco funds and would use less than 15% of optimistic settlement estimates to replace the assessment; others warned that if federal receipts or allocations changed, the funds available to Utah could be far smaller. Several members asked for explicit statutory language tying tobacco receipts to CHIP funding; Dayton noted that the CHIP funding structure and the contingency were spelled out in prior legislation passed the previous year and that the present bill follows that statutory scheme.
Next steps: the House circled House Bill 284 for further work; no final vote to repeal the assessment occurred on Feb. 15, 1999.
