Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HB199 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves bill limiting government lawsuits against gun makers after extended debate
Summary
House Bill 199, which would bar government entities in Utah from suing gun manufacturers for lawful conduct, passed the House 47–22 on Jan. 27 after opponents raised separation-of-powers and precedent concerns and sponsors defended personal responsibility and judicial review.
The Utah House passed House Bill 199 on Jan. 27, 2000, by a 47–22 recorded vote. The bill, introduced on the floor by Representative Matt Trot Morton, prohibits lawsuits by government entities within the state against firearms manufacturers when the manufacturers’ conduct is lawful.
Sponsor’s case: Representative Matt Trot Morton framed HB199 as narrow and procedural. "It simply prohibits the lawsuit against manufacturers by any government entity within the state ... so long as their conduct is legal," he said, adding that the state constitution preserves citizens’ access to the courts for private suits and that illegal conduct remains actionable.
Opposition and concerns: Several members opposed the measure on constitutional and policy grounds. Representative Verint called it "an unprecedented action by the legislature to prevent our local government officials from filing lawsuits," arguing local officials are accountable to their constituents and that the bill would set a troubling precedent. Representative Becker said the bill disrespects local elected officials' ability to protect local interests and warned of the larger policy implications. Representative Tyler said the bill risked infringing on the judiciary’s role: "If lawsuits are brought that are without merit, then it's the judiciary's responsibility to make that decision."
Sponsor response: The sponsor and supporters argued the bill protects lawful businesses and emphasizes individual responsibility rather than litigation as a substitute for policy. The sponsor also referenced broader concerns about "regulation through litigation."
Vote and next steps: With the recorded tally at 47 yes and 22 no (floor record SEG 1055–1057), HB199 passed the House and was transmitted to the Senate for further action. Opponents flagged potential constitutional issues and the likelihood of judicial review if the bill becomes law.
Context: Floor debate included repeated references to recent litigation trends and the balance among branches of government. The transcript records sustained exchanges between the bill’s sponsor and multiple opponents raising both policy and constitutional concerns.
