Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates free fishing license bill for institutionalized populations; amendments and fiscal questions lead to circling
Summary
Lawmakers debated HB182, which would consolidate free fishing licenses for certain institutionalized groups. Sponsors amended language (replacing ‘license’ with ‘certificate of registration’ and adding 'state hospital'), questioned a $16,000 fiscal estimate, and ultimately circled the bill for further amendment and fiscal review.
House Bill 182, brought by Representative Bradley T. Johnson, would consolidate and simplify the state’s provisions allowing certain institutionalized populations to fish without purchasing individual licenses. The sponsor described it as a consensus interim bill intended to make administration easier and align state registration timing with federal three‑year cycles for falconry and other programs.
Floor questions focused on coverage (which types of institutions qualify), supervision requirements, and costs. Representative Hogue offered a technical amendment changing wording from "license" to "certificate of registration" for consistency; the House adopted that amendment. Members pressed whether the state hospital and the Utah State Developmental Center were covered; Representative Johnson offered and the House adopted a clarifying amendment to insert "the state hospital" explicitly into the list of covered institutions.
Members also scrutinized the bill’s fiscal note. Representative Johnson and the Division of Wildlife Resources representative said the fiscal analyst’s $16,000 estimate likely overstated the actual cost, and that any revenue loss from free licenses would be reimbursed from the General Fund into the Division’s restricted account. Representative Dayton moved an amendment to change language so that a sum equal to "one half" (rather than "the total") of certain fees would be appropriated, prompting debate about whether the department or the general fund should absorb costs and whether this would shift the burden onto other license purchasers.
Because of the outstanding fiscal and scope questions, multiple members moved to "circle" the bill to allow further drafting and to obtain clearer fiscal information. Leadership and the sponsor said circling would allow work on amendments and fiscal clarification; the House agreed and circled HB182 for further work.
Representative Johnson said the intent is inclusive: "we certainly never did intend to eliminate anybody" from the benefit of free licenses and that the bill was meant to consolidate and uniform existing provisions.
