Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Olympic Financing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House spreads intent language and advances Olympic-ticket tax exemption, debates financing safeguards

Utah House of Representatives · February 29, 2000
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House examined and spread intent language tied to Senate Bill 272 and related resolutions about Olympic ticket tax exemptions and financing arrangements, including contingencies tied to Salt Lake City Ordinances, SLOC responsibilities and a 1991 agreement referenced in debate.

The House considered intent language and amendments related to Olympic financing and Senate Bill 272, which would exempt certain Olympic ticket sales and user fees from sales-and-use taxation during a defined period. Members discussed administrative rulemaking authority to define purchasers and look-back reporting requirements for the Salt Lake Organizing Committee (SLOC) and venue communities.

Representative Yer and others explained the exemption window, administrative rules and a requirement that venue communities conform certain ordinances to limit state obligations for public-safety costs. Speakers also read and spread intent language onto the journal that emphasized the legislature’s willingness to forgo tax revenue contingent on agreements with Salt Lake City and venue communities, and noted uncertainty around a 1991 agreement previously entered by the governor that the legislature had not ratified.

Separately, the House considered and passed a first substitute to a Senate joint resolution (SJR11) setting contract-like conditions for moving forward with a state-sport financing structure, and voted on timing-delays and conditions for state transfers tied to broadcast and ticket revenues. The resolution and intent language were carried and spread on the journal as recorded in floor proceedings.