Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget Hb1 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves Appropriations Act after contested votes over transit funding, employee raises and tuition language
Summary
The Utah House passed House Bill 1 (Appropriations Act) 50–24 on Feb. 22, 2001, after extended floor debate. Lawmakers debated reallocating a portion of proposed Utah Transit Authority corridor funds to housing and job-training programs, a proposed across-the-board employee pay increase, and deletion of several higher-education intent provisions about tuition surcharges.
The Utah House approved House Bill 1, the Appropriations Act, on Feb. 22, 2001, by a 50–24 recorded vote after more than an hour of floor debate over allocations and intent language.
Sponsor Representative Jeff Alexander described the bill as the product of subcommittee work and noted state revenues had increased substantially this year. On the floor, several subcommittee chairs summarized budget priorities that included corrections facility openings and operational funding, public-safety equipment and Olympic security expenses, higher-education enrollment growth and scholarship funding, and transportation and environmental-quality priorities.
Representative Curtis offered a substitute motion to amend the appropriations package that would have trimmed roughly $2 million from a proposed Utah Transit Authority (UTA) corridor preservation appropriation (reducing a $10,000,000 line to $8,000,000 and making several other line adjustments) and reallocated that money — about $1,000,000 to the Custom Fit workforce-training program and $1,000,000 to the O'Lane Walker Housing Trust Fund. Curtis characterized the change as an 8% reduction in the corridor preservation portion that would free funds for housing and job training.
Opponents of the substitute argued that the corridor acquisition had been negotiated with Union Pacific and that state participation was part of prior commitments, the environmental review and a broader funding package for a commuter-rail corridor running along the Wasatch Front. House members cited an overall corridor cost estimate near $150 million, a previously discussed state contribution request of roughly $44 million, and a final assembled package of about $24.5 million that included cash and land contributions; they warned that cutting the state's share further could jeopardize the project. The substitute motion failed on the floor.
Representative King moved to amend the bill to insert a 2% across-the-board pay increase for each state employee (in addition to discretionary merit increases). Members debated a substitute reducing that to 1% and whether merit/discretionary raises should be preserved for high performers; the motion to insert a 2% across-the-board increase failed (29 yes, 43 no).
Representative Snow moved to delete multiple intent-language provisions in the higher-education portion of the bill that would have allowed the Board of Regents and university presidents to impose tuition surcharges "not greater than 10%" after the legislative session. Snow argued the Legislature — not campus administrations acting after the session — should control budgetary outcomes; the motion to delete the listed intent lines passed and the bill was amended.
After the series of amendment votes, the House voted to pass House Bill 1 as amended, 50–24. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration. The House recessed for lunch following passage.
