Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mortgage Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances Utah Residential Mortgage Practices Act after long floor debate and amendments
Summary
After hours of debate and several floor amendments, the House passed the First Substitute of HB 107 — a bill to regulate mortgage brokers and create a licensing/oversight structure — by a recorded vote of 63–1. Sponsors framed the measure as a response to widespread loan fraud; opponents pressed exemptions and oversight placement.
The Utah House passed the First Substitute to House Bill 107 on a 63–1 vote, moving the Utah Residential Mortgage Practices Act forward to the Senate.
Representative Jerry Adair, who sponsored the bill, told colleagues the measure responds to “rampant loan fraud” and would place mortgage-broker oversight under a state regulator with licensing, enforcement authority, and a mechanism to route attorney complaints to the Utah State Bar. “We need some type of regulation,” Adair said in floor remarks identifying an array of fraudulent schemes and urging a regulatory framework and penalties for bad actors.
Floor debate focused on two central disputes: (1) which state agency should have primary supervisory authority — the Department of Real Estate or the Department of Financial Institutions — and (2) which entities should be exempt from licensing. Representative Harper’s Amendment No. 9, adopted by the House, added an explicit exclusion for attorneys and required the Department of Real Estate to forward attorney-related complaints to the Utah State Bar (amendment text dated 02/25/2000). Representative Bryson argued for eliminating certain industry exemptions, calling the package otherwise “one industry regulating another.” Representative Hickman and others argued the bill remedies real abuses that can ripple through home values and taxes.
The House adopted a mix of amendments on the floor; several more expansive amendments to restore broad exemptions failed. The sponsor and backers said the final, adopted version balances consumer protections, enforcement tools and exemptions for depository institutions that are regulated elsewhere.
The clerk recorded final passage of the First Substitute HB 107 with 63 yes votes and 1 no vote. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further action.
What’s next: The bill is referred to the Senate; any further changes there would return under concurrence procedures. Implementation details (agency assignment, rulemaking timeline) will be set in later stages if the Senate concurs.
