Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Appropriations chair announces $25.94 million in new revenues; lawmakers press on sustainability
Summary
Appropriations Chair Representative Alexander presented updated revenue numbers showing $37,768,500 in one-time 2000 adjustments and an $11,826,500 reduction in ongoing 2001 revenue, producing $25,942,000 in net new revenues; lawmakers questioned how much is ongoing and potential causes of softness.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Appropriations Chair Representative Alexander told the Utah House that updated fiscal analyses released the previous evening show a mix of one-time and ongoing revenue changes, leaving lawmakers to weigh how much of the increase can support recurring commitments.
What the chair reported Alexander distributed a handout and said the adjustments include a one-time 2000 revenue boost of $37,768,500 and a reduction in ongoing 2001 revenues of $11,826,500, yielding net new revenues of $25,942,000. He framed the larger figure committees will use for supplemental funding decisions as $207,661,700 (as presented on the handout to the chamber).
Lawmakers press for detail Members immediately sought clarification. Representative Tyler asked how much of the new amount is one-time versus ongoing; Alexander pointed to lines on the handout showing one-time and ongoing breakdowns and later cited a one-time total of $68,347,100 and ongoing dollars of $139,314,600 on the printed sheet. Representatives raised several possible drivers of weakness in ongoing revenue: lower holiday retail sales, reduced ski-industry receipts tied to warm weather, the rise of e-commerce diverting sales from taxed in-state transactions, and the full restoration of a manufacturer's sales tax exemption that may have reduced taxable purchases.
Context and next steps Alexander said executive appropriations would meet later in the day and committees could reconvene if needed to reconcile sub-appropriations. Members asked whether surplus one-time funds could be ‘‘banked’’ for future use; Alexander said that was unlikely under current rules. The House recessed for caucuses after the revenue discussion and other floor business; the transcript does not record a committee decision to reallocate specific funds during this session.
